What Do the Lines Mean?
Each line on a spaghetti model represents a forecast path from a different weather computer model. These models use data such as wind patterns, sea surface temperatures, and atmospheric pressure to predict where a storm might move. When many of the lines cluster together, forecasters have higher confidence in that track. When the lines are spread out, there’s more uncertainty.
Who Runs These Models?
-
GFS (Global Forecast System): Operated by the United States’ National Weather Service, updated four times daily.
-
ECMWF (European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts): Known as “the European model,” it’s often praised for accuracy in long-range forecasting.
-
UKMET (United Kingdom Met Office Model): Another respected model, often used as a comparison against the U.S. and European models.
-
HWRF (Hurricane Weather Research and Forecast Model): A U.S.-based model designed specifically for tropical storms and hurricanes.
-
CMC (Canadian Meteorological Centre Model): Canada’s global model, often included in consensus tracking.
Who Has the Best Track Record?
No model is perfect, but historically, the European model (ECMWF) tends to perform slightly better than the GFS when forecasting track, especially several days out. However, the GFS has made improvements in recent years, and both are critical tools for meteorologists. The UKMET and HWRF also provide valuable input, especially when storms get closer to landfall.
What About the Average Line?
Along with individual models, meteorologists also look at a consensus or “ensemble average.” This combines the guidance from many different models into one track, which often gives a more reliable picture than relying on any single model.
Why So Many Lines?
The overlapping “spaghetti” of tracks highlights the range of possibilities. That’s why meteorologists always stress not to focus on a single line but to pay attention to the overall cone of uncertainty and the official forecasts from the National Hurricane Center.